Did My Mate Just CRACK the Riemann Hypothesis with AI? [This is NOT for regular viewers.. IGNORE ðŸ˜]
August 26th, 2025 at 9:23AMThe truth is always in the words, what they represent in reality, to be precise. For instance, it's not possible to "live" in a simulation, i.e., "life" in a simulation wouldn't be "real life". We can imagine it because we know what life is and we know what a simulation is, but the idea actually contradicts itself. It really means nothing, like there isn't a single life or simulation to which it refers, not a real life in a simulation of real life, nor a real simulation that simulates a real life. In order to make a real life simulator first a real life must exist, therefore a simulation of real life is not real life. It's a simulation. 😂